The principle of beneficence means that nurses should act in the best interests of their patients. A model for patient care, with caring as its central element, that integrates ethical aspects (intertwined with professionalism) with clinical and technical expertise desired of a physician is illustrated.Īutonomy Confidentiality Ethics Informed consent Integrated patient care model Professionalism. What Is Beneficence in Nursing Beneficence is one of the four main ethical principles of nursing, along with autonomy, justice, and non-maleficence. Comments following the cases highlight the ethical principles involved and clarify the resolution of these conflicts. A four-pronged systematic approach to ethical problem-solving and several illustrative cases of conflicts are presented. In patient care situations, not infrequently, there are conflicts between ethical principles (especially between beneficence and autonomy). The principle of beneficence is an obligation to. Informed consent, truth-telling, and confidentiality spring from the principle of autonomy, and each of them is discussed. Beneficence means that people should be protected from harm by making efforts to secure their well-being. The 4 main ethical principles, that is beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice, are defined and explained. Singer P (2009) The life you can save.An overview of ethics and clinical ethics is presented in this review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 11–32 In: Chatterjee D (ed) The ethics of assistance: morality and the distant needy. Singer P (2004) Outsiders: our obligations to those beyond our borders. Singer P (1972) Famine, affluence, and morality. In: Pogge T (ed) Freedom from poverty as a human right: who owes what to the very poor? Oxford University Press, New York, pp 11–54 Pogge T (2007) Severe poverty as a human rights violation. Pogge T (2004) Assisting the global poor. O'Neill O (2004) Global justice: whose obligations? In: Chatterjee D (ed) The ethics of assistance: morality and the distant needy. O'Neill O (1996) Towards justice and virtue. Murphy L (1993) The demands of beneficence. Miller D (2007) National responsibility and global justice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 101–122 Miller R (2004b) Moral closeness and world community. Miller R (2004a) Beneficence, duty, and distance. Metz T (2007) Toward an African moral theory. In: Pogge T (ed) Freedom from poverty as a human right: who owes what to the very poor? Oxford University Press, New York, pp 275–302Ĭhatterjee D (ed) (2004) The ethics of assistance: morality and the distant needy. Oxford University Press, New YorkĬaney S (2007) Global poverty and human rights: the case for positive duties. In: Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. In: Pogge T (ed) Freedom from poverty as a human right: who owes what to the very poor? Oxford University Press, New York, pp 183–218īeauchamp T (2008) The principle of beneficence in applied ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 33–58Īshford E (2007) The duties imposed by the human right to basic necessities. Arneson R (2004) Moral limits on the demands of beneficence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |